Mario Pasalic
#11
Maybe because the streaming was bad, but I didnt see anything special from him ...
Reply
#12
I thought he was fine, I can understand why he's quite highly rated. He didn't do anything spectacular, but he looks a technically decent player with strong athletic abilities to play box to box. He added a bite and dimension to the midfield that we don't often see, I can also see a good alternative to Kucka in him for us.

He's only 21 and coming back from a really bad injury, so there's still a lot of room for him to grow and contribute more.
Reply