![]() |
|
Mario Pasalic - Printable Version +- AC Milan Forums - Unofficial (https://www.milanmania.com/forum) +-- Forum: AC MILAN (https://www.milanmania.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Forum: Players (https://www.milanmania.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?fid=9) +--- Thread: Mario Pasalic (/showthread.php?tid=1376) Pages:
1
2
|
Mario Pasalic - reza - 08-27-2016 Mario Pasalic 9 February 1995 Midfielder 1 year loan from Chelsea, no option but right of first refusal meaning we can negotiate and sign him before any other team, I guess? RE: Mario Pasalic - millinarios - 08-27-2016 (08-27-2016, 05:56 PM)reza Wrote: Mario Pasalic Yeah I guess, but you have to wonder how many minutes he will get... Another signing that makes little to no sense. RE: Mario Pasalic - reza - 08-27-2016 The loan fee rises to 1 milion from an initial 200k the lesser minutes he gets. Not really if true or if I am reading it right. Any way if his position is Montolivo's I doubt our captain is being dropped any time soon. No Coppa games for a while and no Europe either. RE: Mario Pasalic - xudong - 08-27-2016 Wow, we really are a feeder club to Chelsea. I remember that van Ginkel had a similar clause. RE: Mario Pasalic - reza - 10-29-2016 Montella: "He's getting to a good condition and you can see that he has great potential. If I could, I'd buy him." We sign a player on a 1 year loan and almost November the coach says "He's getting to a good condition"
RE: Mario Pasalic - ACMILAN1983 - 10-29-2016 Not that I disagree with you in that I don't see any point in him coming, but I understood Montella's comment being more in relation to match sharpness, bearing in mind that Pasalic was injured for a very long time. RE: Mario Pasalic - xudong - 10-30-2016 I really wonder why Chelsea always treats us like their feeder club: dry loan, incentive for playing the loanee as well. First van Ginkel, now Pasalic. WTF? Not even Real Madrid would do that to us. ![]() Galliani should be publicly shamed for such humiliating deals. RE: Mario Pasalic - xudong - 10-30-2016 I thought he had a very decent game. Not sure if it was because we played Pescara; still, he has good skills and maybe Montella will use him more often. If we played him enough games, I heard that Chelsea would give us a deep discount.
RE: Mario Pasalic - Siregar - 10-31-2016 He played not bad but it can bee seen that he still needs time, he is still recovering to gain full match fitness. A good option for Montella IMO. Glad to see Montella give him enoguh minutes to play. RE: Mario Pasalic - sylrus - 10-31-2016 not a bad player imo, when others started to fade he still have the fire to keep playing. |