06-12-2012, 01:42 PM
(06-12-2012, 01:29 PM)Kastriot Wrote:(06-12-2012, 01:22 PM)GeoTav Wrote: You're wrong mate ...
Before taking PSG, they asked to the former owners to balance their books (something they started to do 2-3 years before, which could lead to a legitimate question : was the sale of the PSG planned since that time ?) ... Manchester City lived difficult times of "austerity" before being taken too. I don't know the situation in Malaga, but I doubt they had a huge debt.
They only take clubs in more or less good financial health (it's why they didn't even try to buy United, Liverpool, Roma, Barcelona or Madrid) ...
I hope you are right and I am wrong. I never wanted smth similar for Milan. I always thought the best was Milan to be kept in the family. But I think Berlusconi simple does not believe that Milan is sustainable as a project and he can not cover loses anymore.
Well, I also hope it's for that reason, but the reason could also be that we balance the books, just because Berlu wants us to balance the books and not because another potential owner asked us to do so ...
Flamini's gone, Thiago Silva is almost gone, and Ibra could go, if you add that to the former stars leaving, that means our most paid players are or will be gone this summer, which makes our club financially healthier.
One should not speak ill of the dead.
So stop laughing at Juventus !
So stop laughing at Juventus !