05-01-2012, 09:56 AM
(04-30-2012, 04:55 PM)GeoTav Wrote: Guys, about Higuain, I have mixed feelings ...
He scores a lot of goals in Real Madrid, even by being injured half the season, but I don't know, I don't see that player as a solution even if he is a different kind of striker compared to the ones we have and he could add something to our team ...
But there's something I don't like : even if on one hand, getting Kaka' and Higuain could be good for our team, on another hand, we would swap an injury free player (the only one with Nocerino) with two injury prone players ... Given our situation, it's maybe a bad choice !!
Agree about Higuain, I think he's a good player, but I must admit to having doubt about him in our system, it's hard to see how he would fit in.
(05-01-2012, 12:30 AM)abbeyleemania Wrote: Redondo, Gattuso and Onyewu are different case, just because they were injured for long term and Milan paid their wages during injury times. However, they wanted to play for free. For instance, Redondo was always injured, he should have played for free for all season at Milan. You are mixing them with others. These players wanted to play for free just because, they already got that wages when they were injured, in return, they gave nothing.
It's very difficult to judge players. Bear in mind a year's salary is a huge amount (even for low earners in Milan), and it's rare to find footballers who are prepared to give it up for injury, which in most cases isn't their fault.
Redondo, I believe, gave back his earnings for the period he didn't play, rather than play for free. Onyewu extended his contract by a year to play for free, but tbh we gained nothing from it as he left during his second year. Meanwhile, I believe Rino has said he's prepared to play for free for his enthusiasm for the sport. That doesn't mean there's an agreement that he will play for free, just that he said he would do it.