04-30-2012, 07:12 PM
(04-30-2012, 04:55 PM)GeoTav Wrote:(04-30-2012, 03:03 PM)abbeyleemania Wrote: We could renew Flamini at lower wages and keep him instead Ambrosini or signing Mudingayi or Traore. it would make more sense.
Flamini won't accept that kind of deal by knowing he could go back in England and have a better or similar contract in any club there ...
Flamini left Marseille for money. He got a better contract in Arsenal.
Flamini left Arsenal for money. He got a better contract in Milan.
In both cases, it was similar (end of contract, weird situation).
Why wouldn't he do a third time the same thing ?
Guys, about Higuain, I have mixed feelings ...
He scores a lot of goals in Real Madrid, even by being injured half the season, but I don't know, I don't see that player as a solution even if he is a different kind of striker compared to the ones we have and he could add something to our team ...
But there's something I don't like : even if on one hand, getting Kaka' and Higuain could be good for our team, on another hand, we would swap an injury free player (the only one with Nocerino) with two injury prone players ... Given our situation, it's maybe a bad choice !!
You can say the same thing for many players. in this world, Everyone plays for money. if you know a player who doesnt play for money, just tell me.
Sheva left Dinamo Kiev, he got better contract with Milan.
Sheva left Milan, he got better contract with Chealse.
Do you think that a big English side will pay 5+ m euros a year to him? Everyone is not Galliani. if you think, you shouldnt watch football again.
Flamini was awesome at Arsenal, there was Milan and Juve who were after him and offered him great salary. However he went to us. Honestly, now a player who was out with this injury full season, Nobody gonna pay him that kind of salary. in this case, we can renew him at lower wages. 5 m euros was too high for a player like him.