2014 World Cup
#81
Apparently Sao Paolo's metro (subway) has been closed for 5 days now as workers are on strike. The WC is supposed to start on Thursday...Facepalm

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-27757619
Siamo a posto cosi.
Reply
#82
(06-09-2014, 05:07 AM)Aficio Wrote: We have the same thought 4 years ago.

And neither do I think Berlusconi would spend big, but it could be bigger than last season.

You never know, and let's hope for the best.

That's what you get having a rich and unpredictable old guy. At least we can keep on dreaming. Dodgy
Reply
#83
Who cares about the analysis when the studio is located in such a setting Big Grin

http://www.espnfc.com/blog/world-cup-cen...-world-cup
Reply
#84
lol, pretty lucky hey. I must say, while ESPN has been amusing and even alright at times in their coverage of football (I used to watch the daily football show they do), I must say they were always really loud and often just arguing when discussing topics.

For the American posters, is this common in a lot of American sports coverage, as it seemed rather alien to me. I also listen to Beyond the Pitch, which is primarily aimed at North America, but there's much less shouting. I figured that's mostly because it's format is different, much more like an interview with a single "expert" at a time rather than a discussion with multiple experts.
Reply
#85
(06-11-2014, 11:38 AM)ACMILAN1983 Wrote: lol, pretty lucky hey. I must say, while ESPN has been amusing and even alright at times in their coverage of football (I used to watch the daily football show they do), I must say they were always really loud and often just arguing when discussing topics.

For the American posters, is this common in a lot of American sports coverage, as it seemed rather alien to me. I also listen to Beyond the Pitch, which is primarily aimed at North America, but there's much less shouting. I figured that's mostly because it's format is different, much more like an interview with a single "expert" at a time rather than a discussion with multiple experts.

Sports Coverage is very dumbed down here, as most of the people are borderline retarted.

There's a lot of screaming, especially from Stephen A. Smith, calling everyone a racist, but not much of substance.
Reply
#86
Thanks. I must say it came as a kind of culture shock for me, as everyone was just talking over each other. That said, I did find it pretty entertaining, so I can see how it appeals.
Reply
#87
(06-11-2014, 11:38 AM)ACMILAN1983 Wrote: lol, pretty lucky hey. I must say, while ESPN has been amusing and even alright at times in their coverage of football (I used to watch the daily football show they do), I must say they were always really loud and often just arguing when discussing topics.

For the American posters, is this common in a lot of American sports coverage, as it seemed rather alien to me. I also listen to Beyond the Pitch, which is primarily aimed at North America, but there's much less shouting. I figured that's mostly because it's format is different, much more like an interview with a single "expert" at a time rather than a discussion with multiple experts.

Anyone can do that job, as long as you are rude and biased.

And of course, loud too, otherwise how will you be heard? Icon_lol2
Reply
#88
[Image: Bp5z59KCIAAZBK1.jpg]
Reply
#89
Thanks reza, I must say the list looks a lot like I would have predicted. I am a little surprised Capello earns almost double of what Hodgeson earns though.

(06-11-2014, 04:03 PM)xudong Wrote: Anyone can do that job, as long as you are rude and biased.

And of course, loud too, otherwise how will you be heard? Icon_lol2

I think being biased is a prerequisite for the job anywhere Devilol
Reply
#90
Wait. Capello coaches Russia?
MILAN! MILAN! SOLO CON TE!
MILAN! MILAN! SEMPRE PER TE!
Reply